Re-submission

Basically, my work I have shown for summative assessment was related with first and second learning cycle. I was getting interested in net-art movement through researching and categorising net-art projects during first learning cycle and then I decided to take one part of category which was “re-generated” because I realised that the statistic data set could make large kind of visuals.
Through the practical visualisation work for second learning cycle, I could find some way of creating visual which was that online activities and participations of using social network could make expended graphics so I started to deliver this way to my major project.
So I thought that I could show my previous visualisation works with some working prototypes how my work is going to look like and some research evidences I have done, which could support and base my project (actually, I thought that the proof research is one of the most important part of my project because my project is kind of art project so I wanted to answer the question about why I should do this).
However, I realised that the problem of misunderstanding started in this position from my academic tutorial on last Wednesday. As I understood, Martin and Jared expected me to show some algorithm of my visualising rather than how I was thinking, where my notion came from and why my project would be valuable but I missed to show the part of visual algorithm.
Finally, I should have shown the algorithm for visualising and some definitions of visual.

What I am doing
- Visual algorithm for visualising
- Definition of individual graphic unit
- Description of changing visual